DETAILED SYNOPSIS  (click here for a more condensed summary)

John Dewey, Experience and Education (1938)

Chapter 1 – Traditional vs. Progressive Education

Summary: Traditional education is imposed on students from the outside and from above. Students’ limited experiences make the adult nature of the imposed material irrelevant and hard to understand. Progressive education is a natural development, growth from within experience. It offers freedom from the static nature of traditional education and growth through students’ present experience.

Details and Deweyisms:

The opposition between new progressive and old traditional education is a contrast between encouraging natural growth and development from within the schools or of imposing an artificial, backward-looking formulation from outside.

Traditional education relies for its aims, methods of instruction, and discipline on things "handed down from the past." "The chief business of the school is to transmit them to the new generation. It prevents active participation by pupils in development of what is taught -- which is static, taught as a finished product, and is the cultural product of a society that assumed the future would be much like the past. Students’ attitude is supposed to be one of "docility, receptivity and obedience." "It imposes adult standards, subject-matter, and methods upon those who are only growing slowly toward maturity."

By contrast, the new progressive education offers "the expression and cultivation of individuality"; "free activity"; "learning through experience"; acquisition of skills as a means of attaining ends which are vital and appealing to students; making the most of the opportunities of present-day life; and becoming acquainted "with a changing world". Progressive education offers an "intimate and necessary" relationship between the "processes of actual experience and education."

"The general principles of the new education do not, by themselves, solve any of the problems of the actual or practical conduct and management of progressive schools. Rather, they set forth new problems that have to be worked out on the basis of a new philosophy of experience."
 

Chapter 2 – The Need of a Theory of Experience

Summary: All experience is not educative. Experience, as in the traditional schools, can be mis-educative if they are static, don’t contribute to students’ growth, or don’t lead students to understand or appreciate later experience. The primary justification of progressive schools is that, by providing better experience, they provide students with better preparation for lifetime appreciation, independence, and development. However, progressive education, when it is done right, is not simple.

Details and Deweyisms:

Departure from the old traditions will not solve any problems without developing a new philosophy of education. The "one permanent frame of reference" is that there is "an organic connection between education and personal experience"; thus, "the new philosophy of education is committed to some kind of empirical and experimental philosophy. To know the meaning of empiricism, we need to understand what experience is."

Not all experience is educative. "Some experiences are mis-educative" – they halt or distort the growth of further experience; "engender callousness"; or reduce "the possibilities of having richer experience in the future." The traditional classroom may give students experiences, but they are "largely of a wrong kind." Students may thus lose "the impetus to learn."

Justification of the new education "depends on the quality of the experience," which is both "agreeable" and a positive "influence on later experiences." Experience should be "so conceived that the result is a plan for deciding upon subject matter, upon methods of instruction and discipline, and upon material equipment and social organization of the school." The new form of education – while looking simple – will not be easier. "To discover what is really simple and to act upon that discovery is an exceedingly difficult task." "It is a matter of growth, and there are many obstacles."

We should not "think of organizations in terms of the kind of organization … that mark traditional education." It becomes too easy, then, to go back to the familiar traditions rather than face the difficult, but necessary, task of developing an empirical and experimental concept of organization.

Chapter 3 – Criteria of Experience

Summary: If we believe in the democratic ideal, why wouldn’t we want children to have experience with democratic social arrangements and positive interactions, as in progressive schools? The manner in which students learn is as important as what subject-matter they learn; they should be taught in a manner consistent with their becoming positively interactive, democratic, and dynamic learners.

Details and Deweyisms:

Progressive education is "more in accord with the democratic ideal" and its methods are "more humane" (traditional schools are autocratic, with harsh methods). "Can we find any reason [to prefer progressive education] that does not ultimately come down to the belief that democratic social arrangements promote a better quality of human experience, one which is more widely accessible and enjoyed, than do non-democratic and anti-democratic forms of social life?" If so, then we should support progressive education with the principle of continuity as a criterion.

"The principle of continuity of experience means that every experience both takes up something from those which have gone before and modifies in some way the quality of those which come after." " ‘Growth’ is not enough; we must also specify the direction in which growth takes place, the end toward which it tends." "A primary responsibility of educators" is fostering experiences that encourage good habits, growth (physical, intellectual, and moral), positive interaction, and knowledge or skills that become instruments of understanding in dealing effectively with situations to come.

Traditional education does not work because "education is not abstract; learning is dynamic." A learner’s experiences and reactions to knowledge may be as important as the knowledge itself. "The two principles of continuity and interaction are not separate from one another." The argument used by traditionalists that learning today will provide meaning for the future is not reasonable because "we can only live at the time we are living." Only by "exacting the experience from the present can we be prepared for doing the same thing in the future."


Chapter 4 – Social Control

Summary: Everyone experiences social control in life, but this does not have to represent autocratic rule. Social control of individual actions, by agreement and by the members of a group for the benefit of the members of the group, are common and accepted. Teachers should act or speaking firm, when (rarely) needed, in behalf of the group. Students should be participants in group planning as well as activities. The teacher should be a member of the group – the most mature and experienced member. Children should learn manners and should use them when by participating, planning, and interacting with others.

Details and Deweyisms:

"Practical attempts to develop schools based upon the idea that education is found in life-experience are bound to exhibit inconsistencies and confusions unless they are guided by some conception of what experience is, and what marks off educative experience from non-educative and mis-educative experience."

Every citizen experiences social control in life. Children routinely "at recess or after school play games … [which’] involve rules, and these rules order their conduct." "The rules … are fairly standardized." Playing-field disagreements usually arise not because there are rules, but because someone violates a rule. Thus, there can be "social control of individuals without the violation of freedom."

A teacher, then, can take the role of a coach, "in behalf of the interest of the group, not as an exhibition of personal power," but being "just and fair." The educator is also responsible for a "knowledge of subject-matter." "Activities should be selected which lend themselves to social organization in which all individuals have an opportunity to contribute something, and in which the activities in which all participate are the chief carriers of control."

"It is absurd to exclude the teacher from membership in the group. As the most mature member … he has a peculiar responsibility for the conduct of the interactions and intercommunications which are the very life of the group as a community." Students should learn that manners are "the oil that reduces friction." Lack of manners "represents a failure in education, a failure to learn one of the most important lessons in life, that of mutual accommodation and adaptation."

Chapter 5 – The Nature of Freedom

Summary: The most important freedom is freedom of intelligence. Freedom of movement does not automatically create freedom of intelligence, but it can be a means to that end, it can allow the teacher to know the child better and the child to know himself better. Freedom should be of a type that helps students learn to control their impulses and desires. The ideal aim of education is to create intelligent self-control.

Details and Deweyisms:

"The other side of the problem of social control …[is] the nature of freedom. The only freedom of enduring importance is freedom of intelligence, that is to say, freedom of observation and judgment exercised in behalf of purposes that are intrinsically worth while." "The commonest mistake made about freedom is, I think, to identify it with freedom of movement, or with the external or physical side of activity." However, a non-traditional or less rigidly controlled classroom that allows "an increased measure of freedom of outer movement is a means, not an end."

Freedom of movement (as in a less rigid classroom) does not automatically create freedom of intelligence – it’s a means, not an end.

There are advantages which reside potentially in increase of outward freedom. In the first place, without its existence it is practically impossible for a teacher to gain knowledge of the individuals with which he is concerned….The other important advantage … is found in the very nature of learning processes." "Older methods set a premium on passivity and receptivity….The traditional school … erected silence as one of its prime virtues." "Freedom of movement is also important as a means of maintaining normal physical and mental health."

A most important consideration is that "freedom of outward action is a means to freedom of judgment and of power to carry deliberately chosen ends into execution." "There can be no greater mistake, however, than to treat such freedom as an end in itself. It then tends to be destructive of the shared cooperative activities which are the normal source of order." "Freedom from restriction … is to be prized only as a means to a freedom which is power: power to frame purposes, to judge wisely, to evaluate desires by the consequences which will result from acting upon them’ power to select and order means to carry chosen ends into operation."

"Natural impulses and desires constitute the starting point. But there is no intellectual growth without some reconstruction, some remaking, of impulses and desires in the form in which they first show themselves." "The old phrase ‘stop and think’ is sound psychology. For thinking is stoppage of the immediate manifestation of impulse until that impulse has been brought into connection with other possible tendencies to action so that a more comprehensive and coherent plan of activity is formed." "the ideal aim of education is creation of power of self-control." A person whose conduct is dictated by immediate whim and caprice.… is directed by forces over which he has no command." Impulses and desires need to be ordered by intelligence.
 

Chapter 6 – The Meaning of Purpose

Summary: Individual freedom is achieved with the ability to identify desires and create a plan that makes those desires or ideas into realities. It is a teacher’s obligation to provide students with the opportunity to participate actively in the process of creating such a plan of action.

Details and Deweyisms:

Freedom is "the power to frame purposes and to execute or carry into effect purposes so framed." This kind of freedom is "identical with self-control." One of the soundest tenets of progressive education is "the importance of the participation of the learner in the formation of purposes which direct his activities in the learning process."

"A purpose is an end-view," achieved by observing surrounding conditions and understanding the "significance of what we seen, hear, or touch." Thus, a student develops foresight by judging the consequences of the goal or purpose. "We have to stop, look, listen." Consequences are only understood based on previous experiences. "The crucial educational problem is to procure the postponement of immediate action upon desire until observation and judgment have intervened." If mere activity -- rather than intelligent activity – is stressed, then freedom is associated with the achievement of impulses (instant gratification).

Desire does give impetus and movement to ideas. Ideas then are developed into plans of activity. Traditional education ignores personal impulses and desires, but progressive education should help students identify those impulses, observe the circumstances, and apply past experiences to formulate a plan of action and thus make that impulse an idea with a future.

"The teacher’s business is to see that the occasion is taken advantage of." While the teacher should not dominate the students’ actions, he should offer guidance and suggestions. The teacher should be aware of the "capabilities, needs, and past experiences" of pupils and allow their suggestions to help develop a plan. "The plan, in other words, is a cooperative enterprise, not a dictation."

Chapter 7 – Progressive Organization of Subject Matter

Summary: Traditional education fails to teach critical discrimination and the ability to reason. However, progressive education should use, as its subject-matter, the scope of ordinary life and should use, as its method, the discipline of scientific methods to help students derive the significance of everyday experience.

Details and Deweyisms:

"Anything which can be called a study … must be derived from the scope of ordinary life-experience." "The next step is the progressive development of what is already experienced into a fuller and richer and more organized form." "It is a cardinal precept of the newer school of education that the beginning of instruction shall be made with the experience learners already have" and from there build toward future learning. "It is the office of the educator to select those things within the range of existing experience that have the promise and potentiality of presenting new problems which by stimulating new ways of observation and judgment will expand the area of further experience." The teacher’s goal should be "connection in growth."

In the traditional school, "the material to be learned was settled upon outside the present life-experience of the learner" and having only to do with the past. Some have mis-interpreted this as a call for progressive schools to ignore the past; however, "the sound principle that the objectives of learning are in the future and its immediate materials are in present experience can be carried into effect only in the degree that present experience can be stretched backward. It can expand into the future only as it is enlarged to take in the past." "Make acquaintance with the past a means of understanding the present."

"Up to the present time the weakest point in progressive schools is in the matter of selection and organization of intellectual subject-matter." "It is part of the educator’s experience to see equally to two things: First, that the problem [set for the student to study] grows out of the conditions of the … present, and that it is within the range of the capacity of students; and, secondly, that it … arouses in the learner an active quest for information and for production of new ideas. The new facts and new ideas thus obtained become the ground for further experiences in which new problems are presented. The process is a continuous spiral."

Unlike the practice of the traditional school, "the educator cannot start with knowledge already organized and proceed to ladle it out in doses …. [because] the active process of organizing facts and ideas is an ever-present educational process. No experience is educative that does not tend both to knowledge of more facts and entertaining of more ideas and to a better, a more orderly, arrangement of them." The method that should be used "is systematic utilization of scientific method as the pattern and ideal of intelligent exploration and exploitation of the potentialities inherent in experience."

The scientific method "attaches more importance, not less, to ideas as ideas"; it tests these "ideas or hypotheses by the consequences which they produce when they are acted upon"; and "demands keeping track of ideas, activities, and observed consequences … a matter of reflective review and summarizing … to extract the net meanings which are the capital stock for intelligent dealing with further experiences. It is the heart of intellectual organization and of the disciplined mind." Of course, the teacher must adapt use of this method to the maturity level of the student. "But at every level there is an expanding development of experience if experience is educative in effect." Otherwise, as in using traditional, autocratic methods, we "neglect the place of intelligence in the development and control of a living and moving experience."

Chapter 8 – The Means and Goal of Education

Summary: Progressive education, to accomplish its goals, must be based on intelligently directed development of the possibilities inherent in ordinary experience. Those who think progressive education is not successful or valuable are doing it wrong. Progressive education can only succeed when certain conditions apply: Primarily, this involves use of sound standards and methods to achieving its goals, which are based on providing the best educational experience possible to create confident, self-controlled, and capable citizens. Experience is the means as well as the goal.

Details and Deweyisms:

"Education, in order to accomplish its ends both for the individual learner and for society" must be based upon intelligently directed development of the "possibilities of growing, expanding experience." The educational system must move forward toward progressive education. "There is no discipline in the world so severe as the discipline of experience subjected to the tests of intelligent development and direction."

The only grounds that would lead to a rejection of the standards, aims, and methods of progressive education is "the failure of educators who professedly adopt them to be faithful to them in practice." The road of the new education is actually "a more strenuous and difficult one" than the traditional road. "Its course may not be improvised … in an impromptu fashion." There are certain conditions that must be fulfilled for it to succeed: goals, discipline, and effective methods.

"The fundamental issue is not of new versus old nor of progressive versus traditional education, but a question of what … is worthy of the name education." To discover this, we must "devote ourselves to finding out just what education is and what conditions have to be satisfied in order" to achieve it. We will need "a sound philosophy of experience."
 

See a more condensed synopsisReturn to "Lego" page  | Return to Lynda's home page